.223 Remington vs .308 Winchester
Examining the .223 Remington vs .308 Winchester comparison showcases two cartridges representing different approaches to rifle cartridge design and application. The .308 Winchester (150gr Extreme Point at 2820 fps) delivers substantially higher energy, maintaining 2433 ft-lbs at 50 yards compared to the .223 Remington's (64gr Extreme Point at 3020 fps) 1155 ft-lbs. Both cartridges demonstrate penetration characteristics suited for hunting applications, with the .223 Remington reaching 27.0-27.4 inches and the .308 Winchester achieving 22.5-22.7 inches, both well beyond defensive requirements. The recoil differential is substantial, with the .308 Winchester generating over four times the recoil energy (22.2 ft-lbs vs 5.19 ft-lbs). Despite the .223's higher muzzle velocity, the .308's significantly heavier bullet provides more than double the energy retention, making it suitable for larger game where the .223 would be marginal. Remember that performance varies considerably with different ammunition selections and firearm platforms, so these figures represent typical hunting loadings rather than definitive performance benchmarks.
Ammunition Parameters
.223 Remington Parameters (Self-Defense Load)
.308 Winchester Parameters (Self-Defense Load)
.223 Remington vs .308 Winchester Ballistics Chart
Comparing bullet drop at various ranges between .223 Remington and .308 Winchester.
Try Our Ballistics Calculators
Want to calculate exact trajectories for these calibers with your specific loads?
.223 Remington vs .308 Winchester Energy Comparison
Comparing the muzzle energy and energy retention at various distances between .223 Remington and .308 Winchester.
.223 Remington vs .308 Winchester Bullet Penetration
Comparison of estimated penetration depth in 10% ballistic gel between .223 Remington and .308 Winchester at self-defense distances.
Self-Defense Ammunition Penetration
Notes:
- FBI standard for optimal penetration is 12-18 inches in 10% ballistics gel
- Our penetration data is calculated using mathematical models based on sectional density, velocity, and expansion factors. While not actual gel tests, our calculations have been validated against manufacturer test data and provide reliable estimates for comparison purposes.
- Actual results may vary depending on clothing barriers and other factors
.223 Remington vs .308 Winchester Recoil
Comparing recoil energy and impulse between .223 Remington and .308 Winchester.
.223 Remington Recoil (Self-Defense Load)
.308 Winchester Recoil (Self-Defense Load)
Notes:
- Recoil calculations based on bullet weight, velocity, powder charge, and firearm weight
- Recoil energy indicates the felt force when firing the weapon
- Recoil impulse represents momentum transfer during firing
- Actual felt recoil can vary based on grip, stance, and firearm design
.223 Remington vs .308 Winchester Velocity
Velocity decay from muzzle to 500 yards for .223 Remington and .308 Winchester.
.223 Remington vs .308 Winchester Average Cost
Comparing cost per round and training affordability between .223 Remington and .308 Winchester.