.223 Remington vs .300 Blackout
Evaluating the .223 Remington vs .300 Blackout reveals two distinct approaches to intermediate cartridge design with markedly different ballistic characteristics. The .223 Remington (64gr Extreme Point at 3020 fps) demonstrates superior energy retention, maintaining 1155 ft-lbs at 50 yards compared to the .300 Blackout's (150gr Extreme Point at 1900 fps) 1088 ft-lbs. Both cartridges exceed optimal defensive penetration standards significantly, with the .300 Blackout reaching 27.8-28.2 inches and the .223 Remington achieving 27.0-27.4 inches, making both more suitable for hunting applications than personal defense. Recoil characteristics favor the .223 Remington, generating 5.19 ft-lbs of recoil energy versus the .300 Blackout's 7.04 ft-lbs. Cost considerations strongly favor the .223 Remington, with ammunition starting around $0.40 per round compared to $0.69 for .300 Blackout. Remember that performance varies considerably with different ammunition selections and firearm platforms, so these figures represent typical hunting loadings rather than definitive performance benchmarks.
Ammunition Parameters
.223 Remington Parameters (Self-Defense Load)
.300 Blackout Parameters (Self-Defense Load)
.223 Remington vs .300 Blackout Ballistics Chart
Comparing bullet drop at various ranges between .223 Remington and .300 Blackout.
Try Our Ballistics Calculators
Want to calculate exact trajectories for these calibers with your specific loads?
.223 Remington vs .300 Blackout Energy Comparison
Comparing the muzzle energy and energy retention at various distances between .223 Remington and .300 Blackout.
.223 Remington vs .300 Blackout Bullet Penetration
Comparison of estimated penetration depth in 10% ballistic gel between .223 Remington and .300 Blackout at self-defense distances.
Self-Defense Ammunition Penetration
Notes:
- FBI standard for optimal penetration is 12-18 inches in 10% ballistics gel
- Our penetration data is calculated using mathematical models based on sectional density, velocity, and expansion factors. While not actual gel tests, our calculations have been validated against manufacturer test data and provide reliable estimates for comparison purposes.
- Actual results may vary depending on clothing barriers and other factors
.223 Remington vs .300 Blackout Recoil
Comparing recoil energy and impulse between .223 Remington and .300 Blackout.
.223 Remington Recoil (Self-Defense Load)
.300 Blackout Recoil (Self-Defense Load)
Notes:
- Recoil calculations based on bullet weight, velocity, powder charge, and firearm weight
- Recoil energy indicates the felt force when firing the weapon
- Recoil impulse represents momentum transfer during firing
- Actual felt recoil can vary based on grip, stance, and firearm design
.223 Remington vs .300 Blackout Velocity
Velocity decay from muzzle to 500 yards for .223 Remington and .300 Blackout.
.223 Remington vs .300 Blackout Average Cost
Comparing cost per round and training affordability between .223 Remington and .300 Blackout.