.223 Remington vs .270 Winchester
Contrasting the .223 Remington vs .270 Winchester highlights the enormous performance difference between these cartridges designed for vastly different hunting applications. The .270 Winchester (130gr Extreme Point at 3060 fps) delivers overwhelming energy superiority, maintaining 2516 ft-lbs at 50 yards compared to the .223 Remington's (64gr Extreme Point at 3020 fps) 1155 ft-lbs. Both cartridges demonstrate deep penetration characteristics for hunting applications, with the .270 Winchester reaching 45.8-46.2 inches and the .223 Remington achieving 27.0-27.4 inches, both far exceeding defensive requirements. The recoil comparison dramatically favors the .223 Remington, generating just 5.19 ft-lbs of recoil energy versus the .270's substantial 25.01 ft-lbs. The .270 Winchester delivers more than double the energy throughout its trajectory, making it suitable for large game hunting where the .223 would be entirely inadequate. Remember that performance varies considerably with different ammunition selections and firearm platforms, so these figures represent typical hunting loadings rather than definitive performance benchmarks.
Ammunition Parameters
.223 Remington Parameters (Self-Defense Load)
.270 Winchester Parameters (Self-Defense Load)
.223 Remington vs .270 Winchester Ballistics Chart
Comparing bullet drop at various ranges between .223 Remington and .270 Winchester.
Try Our Ballistics Calculators
Want to calculate exact trajectories for these calibers with your specific loads?
.223 Remington vs .270 Winchester Energy Comparison
Comparing the muzzle energy and energy retention at various distances between .223 Remington and .270 Winchester.
.223 Remington vs .270 Winchester Bullet Penetration
Comparison of estimated penetration depth in 10% ballistic gel between .223 Remington and .270 Winchester at self-defense distances.
Self-Defense Ammunition Penetration
Notes:
- FBI standard for optimal penetration is 12-18 inches in 10% ballistics gel
- Our penetration data is calculated using mathematical models based on sectional density, velocity, and expansion factors. While not actual gel tests, our calculations have been validated against manufacturer test data and provide reliable estimates for comparison purposes.
- Actual results may vary depending on clothing barriers and other factors
.223 Remington vs .270 Winchester Recoil
Comparing recoil energy and impulse between .223 Remington and .270 Winchester.
.223 Remington Recoil (Self-Defense Load)
.270 Winchester Recoil (Self-Defense Load)
Notes:
- Recoil calculations based on bullet weight, velocity, powder charge, and firearm weight
- Recoil energy indicates the felt force when firing the weapon
- Recoil impulse represents momentum transfer during firing
- Actual felt recoil can vary based on grip, stance, and firearm design
.223 Remington vs .270 Winchester Velocity
Velocity decay from muzzle to 500 yards for .223 Remington and .270 Winchester.
.223 Remington vs .270 Winchester Average Cost
Comparing cost per round and training affordability between .223 Remington and .270 Winchester.