Montana Deer — Hunting District 630

Montana Hunting District 630 covers 1,016,174 acres and lies 17 miles south-west of Glasgow and 48 miles south-east of Malta. 67% of it is public land, mostly BLM (50%) and wildlife refuge (11%). In 2025, 1,664 people hunted deer here and took 799 — 48% of them killed something. The 2026 draw put up 10 tags here for 67 first-choice applicants.

Tags (2026):20 Nonresident share:capped at 10% Applicants:67 All deer success (2025):48% Public land:67% Size:1,016,174 acres

Your chance of drawing here

Every deer license type on offer in Hunting District 630, with the prior-draw chance for a first-choice nonresident applicant. Type your points in to see your own number.

Chances are from the 2026 draw (the most recent) for a first-choice nonresident. "Points needed" = the cut in the last draw.

Simple view Odds at every point level

630-00 Deer B License 630-00 — Antlerless Mule Deer [MULE] 10 tags · 67 applicants · Standard

6% Point builder 0% as 2nd choice
630-00 Deer B License 630-00 — Antlerless Mule Deer [MULE] 10 tags · 0 applicants · Landowner

100% No first-choice applicants

Hunt	Your odds (0 pts)	As 2nd choice	Points needed	Tags / applicants	License	Season
630-00 ↗ Deer B License 630-00 — Antlerless Mule Deer [MULE]	6% Point builder	0%	—	10 / 67	Standard	Sep 5 – Dec 20, 2026
630-00 ↗ Deer B License 630-00 — Antlerless Mule Deer [MULE]	100% No first-choice applicants	—	—	10 / 0	Landowner	Sep 5 – Dec 20, 2026

What these columns mean

Your odds: the share of applicants at your point level who drew this tag in the 2026 draw. Not a forecast: quotas and demand move every year.
The badge: plain language for that number. Likely draw 75% or better · Real chance 40%+ · Long shot 15%+ · Point builder below that, so you are applying mainly to bank a point · Undersubscribed means fewer first-choice applicants than tags, so everyone who applied drew.
As 2nd choice: Montana lets you name more than one hunt on the application. Miss on your first choice and you go into the pot for whatever tags are left, alongside everyone else's second choices. Points never help a lower choice, so this number is the same whatever you have banked — it is usually worth naming a hunt that goes undersubscribed.
Points needed: the lowest point total that still got a tag in the 2026 draw, and how that cut has moved since the earliest draw we hold.
Tags / applicants: tags on offer and first-choice applicants for them, as the agency published them. Under five tags we print counts instead of a percentage, because one applicant either way swings it.

2 hunts not offered in 2026 are hidden — show discontinued hunts.

What it costs to apply (2026 nonresident fees)

License	Up front	Gone if you miss	If you draw
Standard license	$65	$65	$65
Landowner license	$65	$65	$65

Application deadlines: Apr 1, 2027 (expected) for the main draw · Jun 1, 2027 (expected) for B license. Full fee breakdown.

Other licenses valid in Hunting District 630

Not in the table above because they had no result in the 2026 draw.

B licence — Deer B License 630-01 Standard Permit — Deer Permit 630-20 Standard

The country

Hunting District 630 within Montana

Hunting District 630 and its neighbours

Zoomable USGS topo, aerial imagery and shaded relief, with the neighboring areas drawn on.

Boundaries are drawn for orientation only — the written boundary description in the regulations governs.

Who owns the ground

BLM 510,627 ac · 50%
Private 327,208 ac · 32%
National Wildlife Refuge 113,100 ac · 11%
State trust land 51,520 ac · 5%
County or city land 4,979 ac · 0%
Other public 3,556 ac · 0%
Bureau of Reclamation 1,321 ac · 0%
Tribal 101 ac · 0%
Department of Defense 0 ac · 0%
National Park Service 0 ac · 0%
National Forest 0 ac · 0%
State land 0 ac · 0%

Source: Deer Elk Lion 2026-2027 Hunting District Landcover and Land Ownership Calculations

Nearby areas

How the hunting has gone

What Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks publishes for this area after each season — harvest statistics for everyone who hunted it, not draw odds and not a forecast. Montana's figures blend mandatory reporting with a phone and mail survey. FWP does not publish district-level hunter counts for elk or antelope, so success rates are missing for those.