.243 Winchester vs .270 Winchester
The .243 Winchester vs .270 Winchester comparison illustrates the performance gap between these popular hunting cartridges across different game applications. The .270 Winchester (130gr Extreme Point at 3060 fps) delivers substantially more energy, maintaining 2516 ft-lbs at 50 yards compared to the .243 Winchester's (95gr Extreme Point at 3100 fps) 1855 ft-lbs. Both cartridges demonstrate exceptional penetration capabilities for big game hunting, with the .270 Winchester reaching 45.8-46.2 inches and the .243 Winchester achieving 41.9-42.3 inches, both well beyond what's needed for defensive applications. The recoil differential is significant, with the .270 Winchester generating nearly double the recoil energy (25.01 ft-lbs vs 13.19 ft-lbs). Despite the .243's slightly higher muzzle velocity, the .270's heavier bullet weight provides superior downrange energy retention for larger game hunting scenarios. Remember that performance varies considerably with different ammunition selections and firearm platforms, so these figures represent typical hunting loadings rather than definitive performance benchmarks.
Ammunition Parameters
.243 Winchester Parameters (Self-Defense Load)
.270 Winchester Parameters (Self-Defense Load)
.243 Winchester vs .270 Winchester Ballistics Chart
Comparing bullet drop at various ranges between .243 Winchester and .270 Winchester.
Try Our Ballistics Calculators
Want to calculate exact trajectories for these calibers with your specific loads?
.243 Winchester vs .270 Winchester Energy Comparison
Comparing the muzzle energy and energy retention at various distances between .243 Winchester and .270 Winchester.
.243 Winchester vs .270 Winchester Bullet Penetration
Comparison of estimated penetration depth in 10% ballistic gel between .243 Winchester and .270 Winchester at self-defense distances.
Self-Defense Ammunition Penetration
Notes:
- FBI standard for optimal penetration is 12-18 inches in 10% ballistics gel
- Our penetration data is calculated using mathematical models based on sectional density, velocity, and expansion factors. While not actual gel tests, our calculations have been validated against manufacturer test data and provide reliable estimates for comparison purposes.
- Actual results may vary depending on clothing barriers and other factors
.243 Winchester vs .270 Winchester Recoil
Comparing recoil energy and impulse between .243 Winchester and .270 Winchester.
.243 Winchester Recoil (Self-Defense Load)
.270 Winchester Recoil (Self-Defense Load)
Notes:
- Recoil calculations based on bullet weight, velocity, powder charge, and firearm weight
- Recoil energy indicates the felt force when firing the weapon
- Recoil impulse represents momentum transfer during firing
- Actual felt recoil can vary based on grip, stance, and firearm design
.243 Winchester vs .270 Winchester Velocity
Velocity decay from muzzle to 500 yards for .243 Winchester and .270 Winchester.
.243 Winchester vs .270 Winchester Average Cost
Comparing cost per round and training affordability between .243 Winchester and .270 Winchester.
Cheapest .243 Winchester Deals
No products available
Cheapest .270 Winchester Deals
No products available