.270 Winchester vs .30-06 Springfield

Comparing the .270 Winchester vs .30-06 Springfield showcases two classic American hunting cartridges with different approaches to big game performance. The .30-06 Springfield (150gr Extreme Point at 2920 fps) delivers slightly higher energy, maintaining 2612 ft-lbs at 50 yards compared to the .270 Winchester's (130gr Extreme Point at 3060 fps) 2516 ft-lbs. Both cartridges demonstrate substantial penetration for hunting applications, with the .270 Winchester reaching 45.8-46.2 inches and the .30-06 Springfield achieving 32.6-32.9 inches, both well beyond defensive requirements. The recoil characteristics are virtually identical, with both cartridges generating approximately 25 ft-lbs of recoil energy. While the .270 Winchester starts with higher velocity, the .30-06's heavier bullet provides marginally better energy retention at distance, though both remain excellent choices for medium to large game hunting with only minor practical differences. Remember that performance varies considerably with different ammunition selections and firearm platforms, so these figures represent typical hunting loadings rather than definitive performance benchmarks.

Ammunition Parameters

.270 Winchester Parameters (Self-Defense Load)

Bullet Type:
Extreme Point Polymer Tip
Bullet Weight:
130 grains
Muzzle Velocity:
3060 fps
Ballistic Coefficient:
0.45
Zero Range:
100 yards
Drag Function:
G1
Sight Height:
1.5 inches

.30-06 Springfield Parameters (Self-Defense Load)

Bullet Type:
Extreme Point Polymer Tip
Bullet Weight:
150 grains
Muzzle Velocity:
2920 fps
Ballistic Coefficient:
0.392
Zero Range:
100 yards
Drag Function:
G1
Sight Height:
1.5 inches

.270 Winchester vs .30-06 Springfield Ballistics Chart

Comparing bullet drop at various ranges between .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield.

Loading...

Try Our Ballistics Calculators

Want to calculate exact trajectories for these calibers with your specific loads?

.270 Winchester vs .30-06 Springfield Energy Comparison

Comparing the muzzle energy and energy retention at various distances between .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield.

Loading...

.270 Winchester vs .30-06 Springfield Bullet Penetration

Comparison of estimated penetration depth in 10% ballistic gel between .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield at self-defense distances.

Self-Defense Ammunition Penetration

Loading...

Notes:

  • FBI standard for optimal penetration is 12-18 inches in 10% ballistics gel
  • Our penetration data is calculated using mathematical models based on sectional density, velocity, and expansion factors. While not actual gel tests, our calculations have been validated against manufacturer test data and provide reliable estimates for comparison purposes.
  • Actual results may vary depending on clothing barriers and other factors

.270 Winchester vs .30-06 Springfield Recoil

Comparing recoil energy and impulse between .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield.

.270 Winchester Recoil (Self-Defense Load)

Bullet Weight:
130.0 gr
Bullet Velocity:
3060.0 fps
Powder Charge:
58 gr
Firearm Weight:
6 lbs
Recoil Impulse:
3.05 lbs·sec
Recoil Velocity:
16.38 fps
Recoil Energy:
25.01 ft·lbf

.30-06 Springfield Recoil (Self-Defense Load)

Bullet Weight:
150.0 gr
Bullet Velocity:
2920.0 fps
Powder Charge:
50 gr
Firearm Weight:
6 lbs
Recoil Impulse:
3.05 lbs·sec
Recoil Velocity:
16.38 fps
Recoil Energy:
25.02 ft·lbf
Loading...

Notes:

  • Recoil calculations based on bullet weight, velocity, powder charge, and firearm weight
  • Recoil energy indicates the felt force when firing the weapon
  • Recoil impulse represents momentum transfer during firing
  • Actual felt recoil can vary based on grip, stance, and firearm design

.270 Winchester vs .30-06 Springfield Velocity

Velocity decay from muzzle to 500 yards for .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield.

Loading...

.270 Winchester vs .30-06 Springfield Average Cost

Comparing cost per round and training affordability between .270 Winchester and .30-06 Springfield.

Loading...